The Discovery Channel is Bogus

Thanks for dropping by the site, Richard. For a full response to your comments, please click here.

The toy UFO on a string is filmed with the camera in a normal upright position. It’s a hoax….don’t be so ready to believe the unusual…all o the BIG government agencies that explored John have given up on him…WHY? Because his story holds no water.
Thank goodness for internet…I was able to download his videos and scrutinize them slowly and carefully….such fakery and so cheap too…50′s sci-fi crap

Awww…I really wanted it to be true as well. Where do these lame-arses get off, fakin cool stuff all the time. If they put as much effort into actual science as they did into faking it all the time, perhaps such things would be reality by now.

Hi, wats going on? Im a hutchison finatic, but im still a skeptic. the thing is that i too studied the videos, and ive tried to think of every possible solution to how this can be faked..even if it is upside down. These are a couple of reasons why it may be true. Check this verson of the video, and ill highlight why this effect may be true. By the way..ive watched this video alteast 50 times..in the last couple of days…..it has some sick music.

http://www.americanantigravity.com/video/Hutchison-Heavy-Mix.wmv

1st. he is using magnetic feilds…because he holds up a neon tube that lights up. simply putting a magnet at the top will not recreate the same effects of lighting up a magnetic field. u need a powerful magnetic feild created. If that was comming from a magnet alone at the top of the roof…..then the camera wouldnt work because the magnetic feild given off would destroy it. But having what hutchison described would not destroy the camera since it is only a magetic wave, not the magnet it self. im sorta bullshiting..but wat ever.

2nd. fcuk! theres too much proof, but im too lasy. But from this video..one might think that things are raised by string…..the thing is that objects are flipping so thats not possible with a string..another thing is the way things rise..look at the speed…it goes slower than the speed of free fall gravity (9.81m/s).. also…they make water in a glass rise..ok mr. i know fcuking everything, explain how if the water is upside down…the liquid water stays in the glass?? and when it suposodly falls…why does it stay in?? the plastic glass around it would not fall a quickly and the water would move faster downwards beucase of areodynamics..

But..no matter how a video is explained..its not going to convince u..and really..i dont give a shyt.. but what proved me is the fact that ive talked to chemistry professors in several universities…and ive seen many work from other reserach projects…and they all not only support it..not only have seen it…but..can explain it…to a point.

Lastly about the string on the uFo video.. i saw that too and i was fucking pissed because i thought it was a fake..and what the fcuk was up with hutchisons explination. But i realised that that experiment may be true, but has nothing to do with the hutchison effect. What happens is that when u pass a LARGE Curent through a think peice of metal, it creates a wave that disturbs the air molecules causing it to rise. This is well known in japan as they are in the heart of research of this effect. AND u can conduct ur own levitation experimement u skeptical little Bytch! check this website out.and search for it on the internet for videos. make it urself, it explains how to. I know ur gonna have soemthing to say about what i said u skeptical litte a$$, so email me back.

http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/lifterb.htm

thanks man..and get a life..
lmao

Ajay

J.A.G, Hutchison never said it was UFOs. He clearly stated that it was a toy.
I agree with what Ajay said, minus the derogatory/offensive comments and cuss words. It has been seen by many reputable scientists and recreated in their own labs. Occam’s Razor is true, but to get to the bottom of a mystery, one must first eliminate the obvious unless the obvious is unavoidable.
I am not saying that your theory about his expirements are wrong, just stating my views.

One other comment: you said that his expirements did not follow the scientific theory. If a child conducts an expirement to, say, see if a plant will grow in his dresser drawer, is his findings null and void simply because he did not follow the scientific method?

You can also just buy a video camera, PC and video-editing software for a few houndred dollars and then fake as many of these “effects” as you’d like. The only thing i find special about this whole thing is that there are so many people around willing to believe anything you tell them… the of course is the complete absence of any real knowlage about physics.

I never attempted to explain any of Hutchison’s tricks with metals, although the idea that he is “transmuting” them is interesting. This comparison to the alchemy of ages past is apt, I think.

Instead, I stuck to the anti-gravity claims. I simply stated some possible ways in which these videos are faked: electromagnets and some basic camera trickery, and the basic mechanism of a toy on a string. These two explanations can account for all of the videos I have seen so far. But as I have pointed out on this site, I have seen realistic video of a man in a red and blue costume flying through the air using elastic strings he shoots out of his hands, but that doesn’t mean I think Spiderman is real.

We all know that video can be easily faked. And I agree that the scientific method is not the be-all, end-all of inquiry and discovery (although to wear the mantle of a scientist, I think you ought to accept that basic scientific concept).

So let’s set that aside. Instead, let me ask you believers: if there is such a thing as anti-gravity technology, where the heck is it?

Why don’t militaries have aircraft based on it? Why doesn’t Air Canada have it? Why don’t we have anti-gravity belts? Anti-gravity cars? Anti-gravity spaceships?

Am I supposed to believe that the scientists of the world, the militaries of the world, the corporations of the world and all the other people thirsty for knowledge, technology, weapons and transportation solutions have some kind of bias against Hutchison? That there is some kind of vast conspiracy to suppress his work because…why?

And do you mean to tell me that technology as important if not more important than splitting the atom was developed by some dude using tesla coils in his apartment? I mean, we’re not talking about a better mousetrap. We’re talking about ANTI-GRAVITY here folks, a total refutation of the laws of physics as we know them and a complete reversal of the work of the best-known scientist ever, Albert Einstein! Hutchison should be at least as famous as Einstein. Instead, he resides on the pages of websites that flog ET, telepathy and the rest of the usual claptrap.

And where are the articles on his anti-gravity work in the peer-reviewed scientific journals? Can I see a link, please?

Finally, photos of twisted metal are totally unconvincing to me. Do I know how they were created? Heck no. Could I show you images of rock, metal and wood whose origins and features you would be unable to explain? Certainly. I mean, click this link and tell me that these pictures of metal don’t look weird. But is it evidence of some kind of strange and inexplicable technology?

Very interesting stuff. I remember back in my CMU days we had a 4000 gauss electro-magnet that we would erase hard drives with in labs and than try to read the information off of the drives with an atomic force microsscuip ( sorry for the spelling of that can’t remember it) anyway. we would take to telsa coils and arc them in the middle of this electo-magnet and it would pull the arc apart and do some wierd crap that would make your hair stand on end. it would levitate non-matallic items for a brief time and than drop. just some thoughts of ponder

Thanks Harry – I appreciate it. I’ve always wondered if they’d be able to find the plans for my levitating nuclear weapon. Now I know what to do if the CIA comes knocking.

Here’s a bit of context for the information about John Hutchison on this page:

First, the effect was well documented by Col. John Alexander, who funded a 4-month exhaustive study of the effect through “Stanford Research Institute” and the Central Intelligence Agency in the 1980′s.

A team of four military scientists stayed with John to document his results, and found all of them (as witnessed in the 1980′s footage) to be quite real & unexplainable by conventional physics. Two of the team members were physicists from Sandia National Labs.

Further, there is no definitive physics explanation for the Hutchison-Effect, even by John himself. Quite likely what he is tapping into is a “Torsion-Field” or “Spin-Field” effect, although more investigation is required to fully understand how he’s achieving the results that he achieves.

Also, there are two sets of videos for John — the original 1980′s footage that was confirmed by Alexander’s SRI team, and a second set shot by Peter Von Puttkamer & Gryphon Products in 2001 for the Discovery Channel.

This second set is a concern, because John has been unable to recreate the true Hutchison-Effect since approximately 1991 (by mandate of the Canadian EPA). Puttkamer asked John to get creative, however, resulting in a toy-UFO flopping wildly in the air. This clip has been criticized because a wire is clearly seen suspending the UFO. This was the result of John’s attempt to produce low-power effects by direct single-wire power transmission, and not in any way indicative of his experimental procedures or results from the 1980′s (which utilized no wires or strings of any kind).

I’ve written about Hutchison extensively at American Antigravity — the best reference for background information can be found in our PDF article about a recent trip to interview John at his home in Vancouver:

http://www.americanantigravity.com/articles/220/1/

I would hope that you’ll post this online: on this page, to my knowledge, I’m the only person who’s actually spent time with John & studied both the footage & materials up-close.

Sincerely;

Tim Ventura
American Antigravity

Ade’s was the only real skeptical viewpoint of this levitation circus going on, and while i have downloaded as much footage as possible I have yet to see stable wide angled shots of this levitation occurring. I would also love to see where these objects tend to fly to.

what i would love someone to answer is why do ALL these experiments take place on a wooden board being held up by buckets n shit and why is it this board is NEVER effected by this strange levitation machine.

Also as much as i respect an individuals eccentricities as the next person why on earth would any self confessing scientist have old brooms laying next to wear he is testing stuff? Why an old wooden board with buckets holding it up??? or supporting it.

Another question with regards to the paint coming out the paint bucket… er.. why didnt the paint bucket lift with the paint. I mean if this force can tear metal in half and fuse wood with metal surely the bucket would lift.

I have scoured the net and have yet to find scientific proof of this theory unless I am really to believe some of the sites that seem to believe that we’re are currently under attack by aliens.

Yea… I think Dr Hutchison as much of a great person he may be has still to prove how much of a great scientist he is… considering the lack of proper and significant proof of his erhm… theory… unless Ade says… twiddling plastic toys with wires is kinda embarrassing… even for an eccentric.

Ok. Come ON. It’s quite obvious what would end all this. Scientists can extract a hell of a lot of information from videos, such as studying speeds of cars during crashes, trajectories of objects in explosions, etc. I would think that it would be quite simple to calculate the acceleration of all of these objects being “wisked” into the air.

Let’s see….9.8 m/s^2, BOOM I’m done case closed. I’m SURE they can do this. If it turns out all the objects that “wisked,” did so at the same acceleration, then we know the answer…they are falling.

Just my 2 cents

——– Hutchison Videos ——–

These videos were emailed to me by someone who downloaded them before Hutchison’s website went down (thanks).

Make up your own mind about what you’re seeing here, although note the absence of sophisticated equipment – American Antigravity, the site run by Tim Ventura who is in the comments above, says that Hutchison’s experiments “include the operation of between 5 and 6 Telsa-coils simultaneously, but also include a buffer-voltage that he applies through a variable-output DC Van De Graaf generator”.

This equipment is notably absent in these videos. Perhaps there is an anti-gravity gun offscreen. Enjoy.

• Hutchison Effect on a Plastic Bowl (4 mb)
• Hutchison Effect on Paste Substance (1 mb)
  Note that the first frames of this clip show a curved (metal?) object covered in goo coming out of the bowl, not just pure goo, as can be seen in this still frame.
• Toy UFO Levitation (3 mb, sound)
• Objects Levitating (2 mb)
• Propane Canister and WD40 Can Levitation (2 mb)

Vidio kiled the raydeo staar.

Since we live in a world where capitalist greed appears to reign paramount, why not have a commercial company with a vested interest in such technologies issue a challenge; Anyone; schools, colleges, universities, shed dwellers, etc. who can be the first to conclusively prove the Hutchinson phenomena in practice, provided along with a working theortical model based on sound physics should be awarded a substantial cash prize. This should be accomplished before an elected committee of qualified reputable scientists under externally supervised laboratory conditions following an initial asessment by a member of the committee. Perhaps an affordable fee should be charged to fund the initial assessment to prevent hoaxers wasting time and money. The company that issues the challenge has little to lose and much to gain dependent on the success or failure of such a venture, and since research on the subject will be far from nucleated, those who believe that the governments of their respective countries are suppressing Tesla/ Hutchinson/ Winfield technology have less evidence to suggest so because of the sheer number of people and institutions involved.

Haha, you talk about Einstein like he is THE authority on physics, yet why is his work called “The THEORY of General Relativity”? Which is losing weight, and which does not encompass all of the effects of physics, and some of which is turning out to be possibly incorrect.

I see where you are comming from, and for a minute, I did agree with what you were saying, but just to be sure I looked at the New Philadelphia experiment video one last time. In the video I think I see the evidence to prove you wrong.

In this video

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6122827639205703420&q=Hutchison+Effect

Starting at 1:35 you see a bowl spinning around. Up to this point this can easily still support your theory. But upon further inspection you can see what seems to be powder of some kind swishing around in the bowl.

Therfore, if the bowl was being held upsidedown, then the powder would have fallen out.

Anybody who believes in anything because they saw it on some crappy video they got from the internet or some kooky guy thru the mail is a fool. It is so obvious that these videos are faked thru the use of a rotating table and magnets (electro or not). “Oh, but the water doesn’t spill out of the glass before it levitates” You dummy. THE TABLE IS ROTATING. Take a glass of water, swing your arm around real fast so the glass of water is upside down over your head and let go real quick. Did the water spill out? Believe in this crap if you want, but you are a fool if you do.

I saw a video that was low quality and had back ground music. I thought it was neat so I looked up more information. Then I saw something about a string UFO. Clicked on it and blah blah blah I am here.
How can you not call this guy a fake? What proof is there that it is real? If the guy is a “Garage hippie” and is only trying to make money, then why doesn’t he release his discovery and be rich with that (or sell it?)
In the videos I never really saw anything fall, or hardly levitate (‘cept that large ball, which still stuck against another wall at that). The video does seem funny looking, like the broom glued to floor and other stuff mentioned above (Just a funny looking is all). A plate rotating in circles while still touching the ground (or ceiling possibly) doesn’t convince me of antigravity achieved. I believed anti-gravity being something like space. If I am wrong please tell me. But videos in space show water floating out not actually holding shape. One would think that the water would more likely flow out like the paste or ice cream. Also, wouldn’t a human presence in the video prove to be more realistic. Show me a hand putting the bowl there, then turn it on/plug it up, let me see your foot in there. Holding a camera upside down, creating scenes and different layouts to “prove” this effect is only what Hutchison is, a movie maker.
Hutchison is nothing more than an entertainer creating many scenes to display what we really want to belive is now achievable. I admit I was really entertained for at least an hour watching the videos and reading this whole blog and looking at links. Thank you Hutchison and thank you all!

~By the way, please read the blog and links others have posted before you post. You sound very stupid and ignorant just saying “You are very narrow minded if you think Hutchison faked the vidios.” You are dumb and prove nothing as these other people have.~

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Hutchison_effect_ice_cream.png

wrong link sry

oh, by the way-the guy looks like weird al yankavic, and is much less talented!
chris

Hello Ade,

Thanks for posting a very interesting blog. When I first saw the film, I was very skeptical. Your explanation seems plausible, but I always get stuck on the plastic 7-up bottle and the plastic cup. They both appear to contain water. I would imagine that if it was an upside-down camera trick, the water would be at the top of the bottle due to gravity pulling it down. I guess Hutchison could be simulating water by using a plastic film inserted into the bottle and the cup, but it does look convincing enough.

Someone said that he was probably using a rotating table. That is a good theory, but I believe that would be very difficult to accomplish in real life. I’m no scientist, but I do know the basic concept behind inertia. The water and plastic cup have different mass properties, so the inertia of the spinning table would affect them separately. It is true that you can swing a cup around with your hand and inertia would keep the water within the cup, but nothing appeared to be grasping the cup on the table. The cup would most likely slide off of the spinning table if there was nothing to hold it, unless there was enough force initially to hold it down onto the table (but it would have to be spinning extremely fast). If you did find a way to keep the cup firmly on the table (magnet maybe?) until just the right moment, you would see the water being disturbed by the motion of the table, but this is not apparent in the video. So, the up-side-down room with rotating table is a good idea, but given the logistics of building such a room and the lack of basic inertia influence, I just don’t see it.

The best theory I have seen in this conversation is the box dropping from a distance to make things appear to levitate. It doesn’t explain the other effects, such as the supposed “fusion” of metals, but the other effects could be explained away with the use of other resources. Of course, he would have to make sure that his camera gear was nice and secure to withstand the drop. Maybe he had the box tied to a bungee cord.

I don’t know if it is fake or a hoax; I’ll leave that up to the scientists to figure out. I do know that until there is real prove leading one way or the other, I will remain neither believing nor disbelieving.

Oh, and for those of you who choose to use derogatory remarks such as shithead, fool, idiot, etc., you might try to remain polite in your comments. All of us have a right to our own opinion. Those of you who say someone is a fool just because they have a view different to your own appear to be unsure of your own belief. I don’t know why you use such derogatory remarks. Maybe you grew up in a non-loving environment. Maybe you are less educated. I really don’t know. Personally, I think you’re just a bunch of assholes.

I’ve seen the high res video of the flying saucer…there’s obviously a string attached that bounces it around, and yes an object can flip around with a string attached….tried it myself.

I also recreated almost every other experiment he did…it’s insanely easy…and I did it with everyday magnets I bought at home depot…funny huh?

If a 23 year old guy with some home depot parts, an upside down camera, and a lot of time to waste on weekends can recreate this crap in 2 days, what does that tell you????

Everything he says and does is fake, you’re an idiot if you believe any of it, and that’s the truth.

I can’t believe people still argue over this!!!! unbelievable

Harry,

Kevin Rose et al demonstrated that thermite also works very well on harddrives. =) Although, suppose you could argue that was a chemical wash too… with the chemical being white hot Fe.

-Mike

the hutchison effect is absolutly real- the video is real and hutchison has proven it to acclaimed scientists time and time again. if he couldent prove anything then theres no way he could be as respected by those who do.
doubt all you want but your wrong.

As far as people trying to appear they have the “real deal” on John, they are the only one who has ever come into close contact with him and annalysed his footage and samples, that’s not at all accurate. All of John’s contact details are here: http://www.hutchisoneffect.biz/Contact.html therefore you can imagine all the people who have visited him over the years, there will be a phone call, can we get together, John rarely turns anyone away, then he gets together and gives a tour and an interview with hundreds of people so far. To quote him, what in your oppion is the most important element John, “Well, I would have to say the Human element is the most important factor in all our lives” That’s the kind of person he is. In the last month we have been compiling 500 or more scans of never before made public photos and documents http://www.hutchisoneffect.biz/Photogallery%20Main.html and http://www.hutchisoneffect.biz/Videos.html this is the final official site that is owned entirely by John. I have been pouring over hundreds of videos and documents for months, there is one thing I can say for sure… all of the governments take him very seriously. They ripped him off good. His “Buddy” Hathaway has been getting a paycheque from the CIA since the 80s. His other ex “partners” are all millionairs. John is a very trusting fellow, was that is. As you may have noticed, his site doesn’t have ads, he would rather not make it ugly for a few lousy pennies. John broke his agreement to keep quiet about this so he paid the ultimate price. As for the legitamacey of the “HUTCHISONEFFECT” it was the canadian gov who created the name of it, not John. John would have hounored Tesla probably. Look into the law and find out what would have happened to anyone who faked experiments for any government agency, JAIL, that’s what. As far as those who want John debunked well some are government, some are george hataway, lisacase, hello mel whitfield, I can see you stopped in here. Anyone who’s “Mainstream scientific funding” would be considered obsolite or redundant overnight has a lot to lose too. At least Tim Ventura left his real name. Anyone else want to? Check out the documents and references sections, I’ll be updating those constantly over the next few months.

Well, there certainly has been some interesting debate about the Hutchison Effect in this forum, so I will add my two cents with some video links:

####### VIDEO LINKS #######

http://www.americanantigravity.com/articles/112/1/
http://www.americanantigravity.com/articles/347/1/
http://www.americanantigravity.com/articles/346/1/

This is 320×240 resolution video at 30fps (WinMedia Streaming), so it’s far better than the small-frame stuff that’s been apparently causing so much debate. It’s more than 1/2 an hour of footage altogether, shot by George Hathaway in the 1980′s, so it should at least provide a consistent reference for people to debate.

I am going back up to John’s in the hopes of taping some effects in the next few weeks, which for me at least will hopefully be a debate-ender. However, given the nature of some of the comments, I doubt that whatever I film will change minds that are already made up.

Tim Ventura

I checked out the 36 min clip on the american antigravity website.

First of all, the narrator was a former business partner with hutchinson and he’s a damn-good spin artist. He defends Hutchinson’s close up camera angles, saying “he really likes to shoot close ups.” Of course he does, bc if you saw the entire apparatus it would reveal whatever he is trying to hide. Supposedly he is holding the camera with one hand and operating the apparatus with the other. This seems a little dangerous and unneccesary. There is a $30 invention called a tripod that could alleviate this problem, as well as frame a wider shot, perhaps showing John in frame activating the device. I also liked how the footage was completely blown out and had tracking bands throughout, making me guess that it was digitized in 1978 and stored in an oven broiler for 26 years. The worse quality the footage is, the harder it is to be skeptical, right? Is this the best quality that this redeeming footage could be presented in? I have vhs tapes of GI Joe that i threw across the room during a raging temper tantrum in 1985 that still play in serene quality to this day, and knowing is half the battle!

I also like how the 1991 video footage from the montage, you know, the one with music from “The Matrix” to make it feel hip, is treated like it’s old scratchy film. Dirt, dust, that sepia monochromatic tone, all added in post to make the image harder to see and seem more authentic. Don’t tell me it’s old scratchy video. I work with film and video every day and my eye can tell apart different frame rates and contrast differences between film and video, and this is pure 29.97 fps video. These shots I’ve seen here and there in color on other sites, so they have definitely been treated. So why make it look like old film? Why not show each clip in its purest form so we can look closely?

As a visual effects artist for film and tv I’ve seen and worked on fx that look completely legitimate, yet are entirely fake. Sometimes practical elements such as wires are still used and erased later, which is a rather simple task. We add grain, noise, and color correction in post to marry all the elements of a shot together to make them look more convincing. It’s more likely that electromagnets, upside down shots, strings, and perhaps even magnets under the table sliding objects around, were used, given the background of Hutchinson and the time period, but it’s obvious that some form of trickery has been used. He’s already been caught once and admitted to the ufo on a string. The least he could have done at any point to defend himself was to show a different angle or a wider shot of the apparatus.

It’s also interesting that he was able to reproduce the effect different times over a several year period, but then after 1991 it never happened again, but at this point, I’m preaching to the choir.

Don’t get me wrong, I REALLY WANT TO BELIEVE, I think the idea is great, but there are way too many flaws here. As for the defenders of this theory, instead of disputing everyone’s skeptism, come up with convincing results or footage that will make us think otherwise, and have it be from a source other than Tim Ventura and americanantigravity.com, a site dedicated to Hutchinson, who devote their time to coming up with excuses to defend any claim against the H effect. Spinning is great idea, but it doesn’t work for the president, and it won’t work with science either.

-John

I should also mention about the effects that were NOT filmed upside-down.

The liquid rising out of the cup… have cup attached to board, put liquid in, drop board from a height and keep camera filming relative to falling board.

The spinning bowl… glue a small rubber ball to the bottom middle of the bowl, gently move the board in a circular pattern while again keeping camera relative to the boards movement.

Decaying metal rods… possibly just time lapse or frame-cell camera techniques, meaning some chemical is used which reacts with the metal rod and portions of the results are filmed and clipped together.

Anyway, ALL of the videos can be explained using just a bit of thought (and not even any hi-tech computer video manipulation required). The funny thing is that the effects are not even really done that well, but maybe the best he could do on a very small budget.

Sorry, Starski.

In regards to “paying up front”, it appears that you were referring only to people from an organization that wish to have a “recorded interview” with John.

I apologize.

See, everyone? I made a mistake, and I corrected myself and apologized. Everybody wins.

Is that so hard?

Tom Bearden wrote:

Dear Professor H*****,

Yes, I know John Hutchison, though not really well, having met him several times at various conferences etc., and once having been involved in trying to get a project going around his work (effort was aborted). Also am aware of some of the folks who gravitated (pun intended) to him. Unfortunately none of them are of sufficient scientific horsepower, in my opinion, to get at the real physics mechanisms that Hutchison evokes. It isn’t simply zero-point energy.

John is the last of the true free-spirited hippies! Beautiful guy, but that is his ansatz. But he is a tinkerer par excellence. He assembles this stuff, blasts away sharply, gets anomalous levitations and real anomalous materials effects, etc. (Note that in sufficiently curved spacetime one can get magnetic monopoles also, and so depositing of monopoles in materials also gives very strange fractures, liftings, etc. intermingled with the gravitational effects as well).

Presently none of those associates understands what really is happening., since they are not sufficiently well-versed scientists.

As best I understand the processes, two things are necessary for antigravity the way that John Hutchison gets it to happen. (1) one must make persistent Dirac Sea holes, which before they interact with matter are truly negative energy, negative mass electrons — NOT positrons. We “see” or observe them as positrons because we first interact them with matter to observe them. In matter interaction, the hole eats an electron, which leaves behind an excess lattice positive charge. Hence it is accounted as the “lattice positron” considered and dealt with in semiconductors. That is NOT a Dirac sea hole.

A positive mass, positive energy source charge outputs positive energy extracted from the vacuum (see the source charge solution), so its associated EM fields and potentials are positive energy fields and potentials. Positrons make positive gravity, NOT antigravity, and they also have positive mass. Positive EM energy density change in spacetime makes a little positive gravity. No big thing there.

But a negative energy, negative mass source “Dirac hole” in 4-space, persisting awhile before interaction with mass, also serves as a source “negative energy” charge. It outputs negative energy continuously (see my source charge solution), thus producing associated negative energy EM fields and potentials. Those produce negative gravity (antigravity), a priori. Still nothing too big, but now a step in the right direction.

[SNIP]

Well, a sharp gradient momentarily makes excess Dirac sea holes in the local vacuum (remember when they admit in particle physics that adding energy can lift electrons from the Dirac Sea!), and now the holes persist a bit because of the sharp gradient. They are also 4-spatial, not 3-spatial because they have not been observed (have not yet interacted). For really sharp and really powerful gradients, a tremendous surplus of persistent Dirac sea 4-holes is produced (at the OUTPUT of the process or device). I got that idea while finishing my MS in Nuclear Engineering at Ga. Tech in 1972.

Years later, working with Floyd Sweet on his Vacuum Triode Amplifier (I named it that and the name stuck), we had a beautiful chance to put that notion to the test. The VTA exhibited a COP = 1,500,000 and it could be “pushed” to even higher gain (COP). It was a case similar to the Bohren experiment, but involving far greater magnitude fields and thus far greater magnitude Heaviside components. Sweet had a proprietary process by which he triggered the barium nucleus in a barium ferrite permanent magnet into sustained self-oscillation (that is now known in some magnetic materials, but studied in mostly thin films). But since the nuclear EM fields are so powerful, and their neglected Heaviside energy flow components are thus incredibly powerful, now one really involves some significant curvature of spacetime!

The sharp and very strong gradients also produced Dirac sea holes, because the device’s output (500 watts) was mostly cold energy (converging energy, not diverging energy). Shorting the output leads of the VTA would result in instant icing of those leads, NOT heating and melting. By back of the envelope gut estimates, I estimated that if the unit were “pushed” to double its output, the curvature ought to be sufficient to produce enough antigravity to significantly reduce the weight of the VTA on the bench. At 1500 watts, I estimated, the unit would hover with the local negative gravity field and the local earth gravity fields being equal and opposite. Push it more, and it would levitate.

So I convinced Sweet to do the experiment (he built a new output section to get it done). He did the experiment there in California, with me here on the phone in Alabama. He increased the output in 100 watt stages, from 0 to1,000 watts. The unit smoothly reduced its weight on the lab bench by 90% at 1,000 watts output. A beautiful curve resulted, which when projected would have crossed the zero weight axis at about 1250 watts. So my crude estimate wasn’t too bad for initial work!

(Sweet later confirmed to me that his curiosity got the better of him, and he did add more load and “push” the unit after we hung up. He stated he placed the unit on a tether, levitated it, canted it and flew it around the room. He was lucky his magnets did not explode from the excess monopoles deposited in them. He did explode several magnets in later “pushing” for more power, and they go off like real hand grenades. Disconcerting when one’s lab is in a bedroom, and not in facilities with explosive containment abilities.

[SNIP]

Whew! Now back to the Hutchison experiments. Basically John blasts away, often with two coils at once, and creates gradients that are (1) very sharp and (2) very strong momentarily. So he creates (when he gets everything adjusted just right) some persistent Dirac sea holes, which produce negative energy EM fields and potentials, and also produce negative energy Heaviside components. These latter components are what produce the significant antigravity, levitation, etc. when these phenomena occur (usually not controlled, but just willy-nilly). John has learned over the years how to increase the probability of getting the results, without understanding just what is doing it. He’s doing (in my opinion) another version of the Sweet mechanics for producing antigravity fields that react back on objects in those fields, to produce antigravity effects. It’s getting the sufficiently sharp and sufficiently powerful gradients (discharges) that provide one key to getting those persistent Dirac sea holes whose negative energy fields and potentials — and whose negative energy Heaviside energy flow components — make the antigravity effects.

As a note, Heaviside was a recluse, particularly in the latter years of his life, living alone in a little garret apartment. Years after his death, some of his notes were found in a little storage hole beneath some loose boards in the floor. See
H. J. Josephs, “The Heaviside papers found at Paignton in 1957,” The Institution of Electrical Engineers Monograph No. 319, Jan. 1959, p. 70-76.

In those notes, Heaviside had realized the gravitational significance of his long neglected component, and had worked out a theory of gravity effects based on it!

Professor Laithwaite (now deceased) felt that Heaviside’s postulation that a flux of gravitational energy combines with the (ExH) electromagnetic energy flux, could shake the foundations of physics. Extracting from Laithwaite:

“Heaviside had originally written the energy flow as S=(E’H)+G, where G is a circuital flux. Poynting had only written S=(ExH). Taking p to be the density of matter and e the intensity of a gravitational force, Heaviside found that the circuital flux G can be expressed as pu-ce, where u represents the velocity of p and c is a constant.”
Laithwaite played with this Heaviside component with respect to anomalous effects in gyroscopes. For a Laithwaite paper, see

E. R. Laithwaite, “Oliver Heaviside – establishment shaker,” Electrical Review, 211(16), Nov. 12, 1982, p. 44-45.

Ironically Laithwaite was an up and coming Professor, because of his significant work in gyros etc. Thus he was a “rising star”, so to speak, and so recognized. He was invited to give an address to the Royal Soc. of London, a great honor. For his lecture, he brought in a large, heavy gyro which, when not running, he could only lift with both hands with real effort. So he demonstrated this, and then plugged the cord in and ran the gyro up to speed, then unplugged the cord with the gyro running at speed. Then he readily lifted the running gyro with one hand, to show that something very novel was going on here. He remarked that Newton might be in trouble — which was a shocking “no-no” at the Royal Soc. Lond. Thereafter, his career was curtailed, etc. though he continued to be a professor, etc. He later filed a patent with a colleague, see
Laithwaite, E. R. and W. R. C. Dawson, “Propulsion System,” U.S. Patent #5,860,317, Jan. 19, 1999. See also his European patent WO95/30832, Nov. 16, 1995.

Unfortunately Professor Laithwaite died before his American patent was issued.

Anyway, hopefully that gives some insight into Hutchinson’s work, and (at least in my opinion and in my own understanding) some inkling of the probable physics underlying those anomalous antigravity effects.

Best wishes,

Tom Bearden
Slightly edited

To read the whole thing go here:
http://www.cheniere.org/correspondence/062503b.htm

I’m sorry, what’s the point of contacting John Hutchinson for a demonstration if he hasn’t been able to replicate it since 1991? Can we reminisce about acid flashbacks and the Carter administration? Oh wait, he’s Canadian, nevermind.

I also want to thank those who provided links to explain what words mean. The extra time and effort you made will not go unnoticed, and some day hopefully I will understand these complex words. Until then, I guess I’m just

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retarded

-John

I also perform anti-gravity experiments for people, and at the low, low price of $500 per head. I promise you it’s worth it. I use only the highest quality plywood in my experiments, none of this cheap garage-sale stuff. For props, I mean, shop materials, I use my old Kirby upright instead of the standard straw broom you might find in inferior demonstrations. And if you call within the next thirty minutes, my staff will supply you with a brochure complete with comical misspellings and syntax errors. Because nothing screams “The man is a super genius” like incoherence.

Call today!

This is so funny. I only found my way here because I watched a History’s Mysteries on the History channel on the Philadelphia Experiment this morning, then went to Wikipedia to look up some stuff. I think its funny the kind of explanations people put out there. You know how Wiki is, you can waste alot of time looking up random and trivial things. Anyway, coming across Hutchison and these samples…Whatever! Funny how anyone gets behind this. This is the most gimped stuff I’ve ever seen. I defend the Disc. Channel though, they show stuff that is theory and hoax all the time; that is educational too–showing what is b.s. out there (like crop circles). They should have Mythbusters test the Hutchison stuff. The objects are FALLING, not levitating–any dolt can see that. Especially with the heavy cans, the way they zoom away from the “floor.” Wasn’t there an old man on Phil Donahue years ago that claimed to turn invisible and asked to do it on national TV he said “I don’t feel like it right now?”

FIRST of all

>>>>>Mike Says:
April 19th, 2006 at 4:11 pm
Oh, and lastly, it is quite easy to make a magnetic “goo.” Both with low and high viscosities.
Check out: http://www.kodama.hc.uec.ac.jp/project/protrude.html (pics) or http://www.bofunk.com/video/1233/ferro_fluid.html (short video).
Basically ice cream with with a bunch of particles of a magnetic material in it behaves like it is megnetic itself.
-Mike

I have a question for Tim Ventura. Why would you believe everything Hutchison says [particularly about the UFO on a string]? I smell bias. I often notice lack of criticism between free energy ‘heavyweights,’ they cite one another, no matter how implausible the citations. You kind of start suspecting there is this collective effort happening – to be on the same side, regardless of the garbage that regularly flies around in the free energy field. Mostly it’s all fake or not over-unity, but you can’t spot the legit guys, because they themselves hang out with-, quote- and dine with folks with a credibility problem [Bearden is one of them, where's his MEG? If it worked he'd be demonstrating it around like crazy to shut everyone up, but no, all he's capable of is a river of theory just as weird as quantum mechanics, only contrary to the latter, with zero experimental evidence - it's also funny how much he can tell about the effect right off the bat, without ever witnessing a single demonstration].

Is this a ‘ring’ where the truth is the least important thing? If it wasn’t, why wouldn’t one DEMAND proof before forming an opinion…? Proof which Hutchison is not WILLING to provide. I personally believe the effect is real, but at the same time no one’s ever gonna find out any details about the setup and frequencies from Hutchison himself, who just wants to be doing interviews and appearing on TV like some celebrity. That’s ALL that is in his interest these days…

And don’t film your hand or prick or a tree and tell me “IT’S ONE OF GOD’S CREATIONS!” ’cause it aint…..!

ok lets start some where…”how heavy are the things floating?” 75 lb cannon ball…. “How much power is being put in to achieve this.” 400 watts and less “How high are they floating?” depends on the lab 20 feet on the news. Furthermore quantities would help in reproducing the effects. samples may be purchaces from John on the contact page… one of his coolest ones went for 1500$ on ebay. “it’s also funny how much Bearden can tell about the effect right off the bat, without ever witnessing a single demonstration” Bearden is privy to other experiments like this in other countries. John isnt the only person, nor the first… just the only one to ever talk publicly and sacrifice all future funding. ” Proof which Hutchison is not WILLING to provide. I personally believe the effect is real, but at the same time no one’s ever gonna find out any details about the setup and frequencies from Hutchison himself, who just wants to be doing interviews and appearing on TV like some celebrity. That’s ALL that is in his interest these days…” John has been doing levitation demos for about 500$ per session for private individuals for about 2 months now. Contact him and buck up or buck off! want some frequencies? I got them written on a little piece of paper in my wallet… here is the big whoopdy do secret…. ready?… start with 3 tesla coils, 7.5khz , 5 mhz , 14 mhz , harmonize 4.55 khz RF , voltages and watts for the big stuff… if you want jellification 3000w , 1,000,000 v out of the coils, 2,000,000 v electrostatics , 500,000 v van de graph generator , use also deuce 12X15 army units.. and a mechanically pulsed magnetron. large variacs control the x-ray transformer(s) putting out up to 200 000 v, at 10-100 milliwats. get all that? thats it, thats all. Some of you would instantly blind yourself by just turning on the magnatron. others would roast themselves with the tesla coils. if some of you are as stupid as you sound explaining trick photography, dont even aquire any of this equipment ok? here is the disclaimer… no one is qualified to ever try this. so dont. John knows i put this info out here, there will be many more demos to come in his new upcomming series, short but very revealing. public demo in new westminster possibly in a month… possibly… depends on the fire marshal… mayor seems to like the idea of some tesla equipment on the quay in the dark… i hope they let him do it.

where is this intel come from?

as we nail down locations, dates and details ill post them here, as well as a few other places. this stuff is for non proffit by the way, there will be no fees for public demos… depending on the fire marshal weather the public is allowed to get close, all i will say right now is bring your sunglasses, even if its dark.

nice of you to show up mel whitfeild, your not dead yet? Your entire vocabulary is dated. Your the very last of your kind I think.

1st quote
*Bearden is privy to other experiments like this in other countries.*

What other experiments? It’s easy to invent non existing other experiments, a little harder to substantiate them. I’m all ears.

2nd quote
*John isnt the only person, nor the first… just the only one to ever talk publicly and sacrifice all future funding.*

With an attitude of a con man no self respecting enterpreneur would ever support him, not even Prince Hans Adam II.

3rd quote
*John has been doing levitation demos for about 500$ per session for private individuals for about 2 months now. Contact him and buck up or buck off!*

Buck up or buck off? This is like David Copperfield now. If you want to see him fly, you’ll have to buy the ticket. Hutch can shut us all up by providing a FREE PUBLIC DEMO OF levitation and metal jellyfication, with a 400W input. Will he? Nope, pay up or shut up, eh? Not that paying up would produce those effects, hahaha.

4th quote
*got them written on a little piece of paper in my wallet… here is the big whoopdy do secret…. ready?… start with 3 tesla coils, 7.5khz , 5 mhz , 14 mhz , harmonize 4.55 khz RF , voltages and watts for the big stuff… if you want jellification 3000w , 1,000,000 v out of the coils, 2,000,000 v electrostatics , 500,000 v van de graph generator , use also deuce 12X15 army units.. and a mechanically pulsed magnetron. large variacs control the x-ray transformer(s) putting out up to 200 000 v, at 10-100 milliwats. get all that? thats it, thats all.*

All this I already know, because I’ve downloaded all Hutchison’s documents available online. By the way, among other things, you forgot the alpha source and the spark gap. And what people want to hear is the EXACT positions, EXACTLY which devices were used, model numbers, everything. So that the setup can be approximated and the resluts duplicated.

5th quote
*there will be many more demos to come in his new upcomming series, short but very revealing.*
David Copperfield again.

6th quote
*as we nail down locations, dates and details ill post them here, as well as a few other places*

Geez, I thought you didn’t want publicity. Folks don’t want demonstations, they want a reproducible effect. Know what that means? That’s how science works. If you don’t let OTHERS do it, so that there can be no doubt as to the validity of the effects, you’re considered a SCAM. If one is afraid of possible loss of sensitive information there’s a thing called NON DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT to ensure legal protection. But other people NEED to be able to reproduce the effect! Now, is Hutchison ever going to let them do that? No!
Enough said…

its a shame there is no tranparency in process by either Hutchinson, Ventura or Bearden as these claims fire the imagination in regard what might well be possible in the quantum age. it wouldn’t take much for John to protect his own intellectual concerns while at the same time providing sufficient information for other inquisitive minds to attempt to replicate his findings. obfuscation in discovery is typically a sign of either deception or that the person making the claims misunderstands exactly what they are observing and the process they employed. untill transparency and openness are adhered to, the claims they make will be worth nothing in the long run and no amount of chest beating, arguments from authority, arguments from inside knowledge and obfuscatory smuggness will prove them true, only replicationreplicationreplication can do that. if they are genuine they will front up, if they are charlatans they will continue to play games.

“Everything I’ve seen in his videos I could reproduce exactly… including what “appears” to be water falling up out of view.”

dear Ein ,

if u are a magician make this demo. i don’t see no new vids, only words.

pupils, let’s review this: it all startet from a show on Discovery. Discovery is a well organised and managed product. They don’t have the currage to air something false because if they do so , when pupils will find out (because truth alwais comes out) they will loose there credibility. Therefore , they aired this sheet about Hutchinson because it’s real and no words from a “magician” cand convince me, only another vid or the show where Discovery tells it was a false… I don see this comeing..

Remember how many years took the world to accept Einstain!?

PS: sory my bad spelling.

Annon, or should I say Starski, anyone reading your posts can see you’re an mentally castrated individual, totally detached from reality. Sweet dreams.

John’s new website domain name is http://WWW.HUTCHISONEFFECT.CA

I think Criss Angel is doing a better job than Hutchinson…

The best part about reading this blog is how so many of us came through the same “funnel” to get here.

I saw some video of this effect, became interested and did a search, then ended up here. Something I thought was pretty random but apparently happens over and over again.

I agree though, why is it that only the objects put in the camera’s view are effected, why not the table, or supports or anything else. It’s always an out of context object that gets levitated. If the force was so random and so powerful you would think it would flip the table now and then.

Oh well, I’ll keep an open mind but until he replicates the effect, I’m leaning towards fakery.

Interesting read. I’ve lived a fairly long time and have seen unexplainable things (at least to my limited understanding and observation) that I have never discussed publicly for fear of ridicule. The world has plenty of unexplained anomalies and any number of people who can replicate them artificially and I always retain the possibility that what I have seen or actually do see at any specific time I do so because that is what I choose to see regardless of reality. I also know that no matter how hard I try to get to the truth of anything (even something as seemingly straightforward as the nature of electrons), there is always another conflicting opinion to the one I am familiar with that seems just as plausible. I have finally had to accept that I am fatally flawed by two problems: 1. As a human capable of a lot of intelligence I always assume to more understanding than what I possess, and 2. My experience as a human limits my ability to accept the possibility of anything that does not agree (probably bad word choice) with my previous human experiences. Nevertheless I plan on retiring completely this year and truly think it would be worth the time and money to drive up (as part of a vacation) and pay the money to see what can be seen. If nothing else I can take the opportunity to do some nice fishing afterwards. If disappointed, it won’t be the first time or even the most expensive disappointment I have paid for, so Starsky, if the site is still up and the offer still valid, I will contact you later. As for everyone else who would label me a fool, go ahead, I realized it myself years ago. If this site is still up and this thread still open (I know I hope a lot), then I will be happy to give as unbiased an opinion as a man who is doubtful of all he knows can give. Thanks just for the opportunity to speak.

Just one quick note: the last two posts by ME were in fact by Starski, who likes to pretend & distort the truth a tad too much these days…

Greetings

Great read (except for the 40% childish postings defending the claimed effect with profanities instead of evidence). However, going back to Ade’s original writings it seems fundamenally disturbing that any experiment that could produce antigravity would not become instant headline news in the mainstream media as well as in the scientific community – be it in the 80s or the present. If the products needed to reproduce antigravity are publicly available then private as well as government institutions would have done so since the birth of the Hutchison miracle. And some if not all would have made the proper arrangements to document the affair. It is not as much a hoax as it is an eccentric man’s way to achieve enormous attention to a fringe science fiction subject. This belongs in the fake moon landing category. No matter how much evidence you lay on the table, conspiracy theorists will never rest. Because it is just such a good story, right?

Even if mr. Hutchison or his pubic relations affiliate would let people pay money for private sessions to see this sci-fi-come-true-breakthrough (if people call at the proper time with the poper attitude…) let it each time be filmed and documented, feed the footage to scientists around the world and receive the Nobel prize to standing ovations.

You do not need to get technical to prove or disprove the supposed effects. The fact that it has not – this, the greatest discovery of mankind as of yet – been replicated and properly documented by the demonized skeptical scientific community puts the final nail in Hutchison’s coffin.

I am not anti-antigravity. That would indeed be a welcomed revolution but I think we are kissing a frog here.

Kind regards

Claus from Denmark

SOULD I ADD MORE he he lol oh i must its a boreing day i have hundreds of hours of tapes done by scientists george jack houck vancouver exsperiments for washington d.c yes sir iam an engineer and dicovery of long forgoten tech i do many other shows http://www.bluebookfilms.com art of the covenant check it out we did it plus many other tests oh yes t t brows work the string as you call it is no 32 guage wire loaded at 20 volts dc in combination with the heffect the wire is clearly shown right a good faker like you call me here would not let that slip right ? right my point ecactly so how about others who do what i do geee reminds me of the cold fusion stuff so ok what have i got from all this ? hell of a lot of stagnation i do like the times i did work for usa army inteligance canadas dsti; gruop germany gruop; read the letters ;;;;; they had fun also geee as well as boeing with alik and george in 1987 to 89 dr erron kovacks boeing gruop george lisacase alik shereveseky we have an anual levitatation tranformer falling on george party ;; we levitated 1500 pounds transformer poor george was 6 months in hospital and hes the world exspert on this so folks who come here and film make big bucks at least tv folks pay up front while others run awway and get funding like george one and no 2 plus others hey money for us but never me so i no longer entertaine these folks no no no;;;; maybe my black ops friends thats ok or television folks but no gold diggers so any ideas on selling this stuff ????? iam as i said going for other projects get a life ; help folks ; hell i dont do batteries ; dropped that as its boreing shit ;;; life exstenstion is great i can help otheres there also plus theres all kinds of alternative energy ok folks help me unload this great collection so i can get out of this dump and dumppy kind of enviroment thanks hey hell with notes why why why iam not proveing a thing we should start a carnival act mr electro bits you in the but or the international tuna think tant society or support real levitation thew ottis the elevator company but folks buy into real fantasy as searl plus other fruitcakes did i say that oh same on me iam the biggest fruitcake around hummmmmmmmmmmm woman love that part yeppers folks try me you might like me

John –

Do not forward or I will seriously kick your ass…I’ve been drinking beer, so I’m being more honest than usual. Jesus, breaking my own rules…

NGEO is National Geographic.

“XXXXX” is OSD – and the “aerospace exec” I told you about is actually is Paul’s boss — an undersecretary of defense. Not sure which one…

They’ve been pushing BPP (and your work) into the Pentagon for about 2+ years now – the Pentagon presentation I told you about was their biggest push. Remember – standing ovation? That was CIA, DIA, NRO, USAF, and a few others….about 400 officers in a joint briefing, at least that’s what I was told.

They’ve been fighting on behalf of your research like crazy for the last couple of years, mostly because of the footage that we put together. They want to fund you. GXXXX doesn’t (he would, but doesn’t have the budget). If they fund you, it will be pure science, not weaponized..

PXXX is a believer, but his boss is still skeptical – that’s why I need to get solid footage with HZXXX. If I can get that, you’ll have somebody really valuable at your place in the very near future.

THAT is the reason that I’ve been bugging you so much lately — you’re amazingly close. Closer than John Alexander, who was a Lt. Colonel. Right now we’re at the undersecretary of Defense, and I know that Rumsfeld has looked at your work also. If we can put together a couple of hours of solid footage, then we’re set. Then you’ll have a lab, and I’ll quit pestering you.

BTW – If it matters, the “funders” that I told you about are Army Intelligence out of Ft. Meade (NSA). They showed up about 6 months ago. Mostly their interest is having me cover aXXXXXXX conferences, but my handler is friends with PXX, so part of our deal was letting me cover XXXresearch without being censored. (I didn’t ask about UFO’s, and I have no clue about anything else).
XXXX

——————————————————————————–
From: john hutchison [mailto:heffect@infinet.net]
Sent: Monday, August 07, 2006 12:40 AM
To: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Subject: RE: XXXX and I coming over..?

Hi tim what is ngeo ?? what does lisa want ?? she can have it as it leads to good things in the long term I got it here

gGEE I GUESS EVERBODY LOVES STANDING ON THERE HEAD ROLF J.H

Yeah … long page… hmmm, not long enough, i’m adding to it.

Someone here wanted a movie of GOD. Ok, i have one … a closeup of course. You can see very well his left foot. And some robe. Oh wait, that may be his son. Not sure; my timetravel machine is sort’a offline now, so until i repair the transspacial high frequency redemodulator coil-ar bobine (hihi) i’m unable to go and compare the sample.

And these experiments are also true. I’m using this technology for the hoovercraft i use to get to school. Really useful and lowcost, not to mention environment friendly(I got the plans from the local car factory who would not build such a thing because it’s too cheap and people would just buy too many cars/hoovers so the streets will get over-crowded) .

All is good, except a few times, people around me melted inside the street’s concrete and people at the bowling arena complaining about there ball not reacting properly, and (of course) lead going gold (where did you thought i have the money to get the “redemodulator”? intensive lead to gold operations! duh!). I did found out that using iron you get more gold that using lead.

Really! If this things are true would not be just great?!
To have cars that go on electric power so you can recharge them at home and don’t destroy our environment and health.
And if a car for everyone is too hard to do just do public transportation more effective.

and what is this? http://www.hutchisoneffect.ca/Videos/Portal.swf
a swf showing a “portal”?
Oh like the one in my timetravel machine?
No?! Like a teleporter?!!
Great! We can then build one portal in every city … no! one in every country, so we get easy from place to place. Of course some people will complain about having to relocate from Berlin to Amsterdam first in order to only then get to London, thus taking a whole minute of travel. In place of 15 seconds if it was direct connection.

Have fun and good luck … i go back to work on my coil redemothingie :D

For the people who think the hutch experiments are real: In the text above i used a lot of sarcasm. I’m NOT having a timemachine nor a hoovercraft.

How Hutchison does it: first of all you cant hold a piece of aluminum to the ceiling with a magnet! so how do you make a piece of aluminun float up or a liquid for that matter? easy.
set it up on the floor of a “small’ room , the solid objects will rest on the floor, and the liquid will sit quietly in its container. the camera is right sid up too but firmly attached to the room. Now turn the room upside down and viola! want to make it float slowly up? use a high speed camera and then slow down the play back! duh!
anything you dont want to float up, glue it down or nail it down like the broom.

ok thats my sceptical take on floating, now what about melting wood into metal. any of you sceptics got a good explanation of how to do that?

what going on i find funny as you never saw the behind the scenes stuff http://www.johnkhutchison.blogspot.com

Hi Folks

I came across this website. In the following I tried to make an image about the
lot of writing and believing:

i) There exist claims about weired effects on matter that interacts with high voltage,
high frequency electromagnetic fields emitted from (obviously more than one)
Tesla coil – summarized as ‘Hutchison Effect(s)’.
Further, Hutchison claims to have developed a power source, that never exhausts.

ii) I saw several videos, photos and ‘references’ – that do simply proove nothing.
Discussions about how to fake a scene are not worth of a single line of writing. (Ask
a special effect professional instead; e.g. the Stargate makers)

iii) Physics is an exact science, where you can describe an experimental setup and
everybody should reproduce the results with an identical setup. Folklore in the
counterpart should entertain people with impressive stories, obscured means,
pictures and movies.

iv) Since I couldn’t find any detailed description of the experimental setup or results
all the rumors must be strictly categorized into folklore. (It would by much easier to
clamp a simple load resistor to one of the inexhaustable perpetuum mobile batteries
and record the output energy for saying six months – instead of investing time for
website- and blog-creation. Hint: E = t · (U² / R ); while E[Joules], t[secs], U[Volts],
R[Ohms]

v) As I understand, the inventor argues, that he stands in contact with several officials
and military institutions. Such arguments fail to proove the claims. Why? If sombody
would really be able to manipulate spacetime and matter as described, the technology
was a threat for national security and had been immediatly classifed. This blog had never
existed. If not, the governement has no longer a reason to take hands on the folcloristic
‘inventions’.

vi) I think everybody should get a second chance. If the inventor is convinced to have
made really important inventions, I would suggest he describe his setup, materials
and results in a scientifically correct manner.

Kindly
Sacha

Hello there, I simply decided to leave my own two cents to this barrage of nonsense, judgment and analysis about a “yet to be understood” direction of science. As has been often quoted “Any significantly advanced technology, will seem like ‘magic’ to a lesser advanced people.” This is true across the entire spectrum of science and societal progress, when a rainforest native sees an airplane, he will likely still not understand in the slightest, how it flies through logical and careful building of materials and principles until it is capable of flight, just as the Wright brothers took years to make an impact with their flying machine, any jump in technology, thought of idealism which is large enough to cause leaps of progress once understood, MUST face tremendous adversity to entrenched plains of thought!

I recently was privileged to watch a Prof. demonstrate the inherent electrical power of two streams of water falling through conducting metal pails, every few seconds there was a high voltage spark generated off of the two bottom pails, I’m no scientist – period. But that extremely simple assembly, which was referred to as a battery, obviously follows basic principles of electricity generation. I believe there is a multitude of technologies yet to be found, studied or understood by Mankind in general, regardless of current knowledge, I think it is a disservice to our fellowman to not give new thinkers the benefit of the doubt when they attempt to forge new paths of knowledge. Even if something is completely debunked by certain past research (Take note: Bumblebees should not be able to fly according to many current scientists – Look it up), it should still be respected as a possibility. I don’t expect anyone to carelessly give out their support, money or help to anything they haven’t proven viable to themselves, I’m simply saying – “There are more things in Heaven and Earth then Man can dream of� (my apologies of that quote isn’t perfectly accurate, but you get the idea!). I have been exposed to politics, free energy, life principles, religions, down to earth farmers and in the clouds dreamers my entire life, I have seen a huge spectrum of thinkers, doers and fanatics, one thing stands out above all – New and Completely Unexplored Realms are Waiting to Be Discovered – DARE NOT Discourage Those with the Courage to Seek Those Realms, Even if YOU, Choose NOT To.

What i find most interesting is that many of the same people who try to discredit this stuff go to church on Sundays and still believe jesus walked on water or that the serpent grew a voicebox and had a chat with lady eve.

Dear Armchair Critics~
I know the internet has jaded you.
We all have been let down by some hoax we wanted to believe in at some point or time..
But John Hutchison is for real.
So what if he cannot reproduce the effect 100% of the time… That doesn’t invalidate his discoveries, ideas, and creative energy.
And as for Einstein comparisons… you all do know he wasn’t formally educated either, don’t you?

It’s reckless to slander a person without hard evidence.

Keep up the amazing work Mr. Hutchison, and THANK YOU!

Hutchison and his supporters exhibit all of the classic symptoms of pseudoscientific irrationalism. Rather then reproduce his writing, I suggest that interested readers look at Professor Steven Dutch’s pages devoted to just such silliness at http://www.uwgb.edu/DutchS/pscindx.htm. Dr. Dutch is a Professor of Earth Sciences at the University of Wisconsin, Green Bay and has devoted a huge amount of time to the analysis of irrationalism. His pages are well worth a few minutes.

Just a couple of notes:

Einstein graduated from the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich. It is said that Einstein was a poor student in elementary school, and people extend this to “Einstein was a poor student and was a genius. I am a poor student, so I am also a genius.” This is a fallacious argument, and would be so even if Einstein had actually been a poor student. He was not. He had some early speech difficulties but was an excellent student.

Paranoia is another hallmark of the pseudoscientific crackpot. “John is accepting donations that he will be putting to use to free society from the slavery induced by fossil fuels. If you would like to join the “resistance” you can get an anonymous money order from safeway, or if you are brave enough to put your name to this cause then send a cheque.” Straight from his web site.

It is true that showing how the “effects” in his video could be created with tricks and manipulation doesn’t prove they are not real. But it is not up to the skeptics to provide proof. As the saying goes, extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. So far, the Hutchison and his supporters have not even supplied ordinary proof. The ball is clearly in their court.

Finally, the vulgarity exhibited by some of his supporters in this blog would lead me to believe that they have deficient reasoning abilities even if there were some objective evidence of the reality of the so-called “effects.”

Yes by the way, the posts labeled by John, were him. the email he posted was a drunken Tim Ventura trying to pressure him to work for the pentagon. He still persists to this day.

Ive followed the Hutchsion effect with interest. Theres a lot of talk about Science being exact!. Ever heard of the Heizenberg Uncertainty priciple? Einstein didnt like Quantuum Mechanics. Electrogravitics has been and still is studied by the Military since Biefield Browns experiments way back. If you want proof of the Technology in use, check out area 51 or the huge triangular TR3B If they arnt Military, what are they? You dont want to go down that road . If you have further doubts then the prosepect of cold fusion would be and area for you to explore. Its not readily reproducible but its being exploited by corporates. What happens is that inventors make discoveries and science perfects them. Science cannot explain certain things and never will. That dosnt stop development of such ideas.

It really ticks me off when people who aren’t scientists/engineers/professionals try to tell scientists/engineers/professionals:

#1: That everything they studied in college for 4+ years is wrong. Does that even make sense? Getting a degree doesn’t make one an instant expert, but it can sure lead one in the right path of not being an ignorant amateur.

#2: How to to their jobs, or that they’re not doing something right, based on “what they think is right”. This one gets me red just thinking about it. Sadly, many legislators fall into this category. If someone ever tells me that they know best, and they use their vast years of google/wikipedia knowledge versus my years of training and schooling, I’ll punch them right in the throat.

In case you didn’t want to read the above crap, here’s my point: Let the trained professionals do their job, and stay out of the friggin’ way. The people who have studied physical laws in a formal sense who can’t replicate these experiments in a controlled setting probably know a thing or two. For instance, that it’s bogus.

Remember cold fusion?

Yeah, it’s really a shame what’s become of New Scientist.

While we’re talking about silly issues that won’t go away, apparently neither will this:

http://www.alaska.net/~clund/e_djublonskopf/Flatearthsociety.htm

Yes, well, Nature published an article by Targ and Puthoff on psychic phenomena as well. I note that I have to pay $4.95 to see the answer to the breathlessly asked “Could it really be true that nuclear fusion …”

I’m going to save my money.

P.S – Im all for Skepticism of such subjects but just saying it aint so isnt a full scientific rebuttal.

pseudoscientist types are very similar to cult types who are almost religious about their beliefs, irregardless of a lack of evidence. Bearden is very very privy to alot of suppressed non-public information, this I know. Having had access to John’s video library that has been aquired through his entertainment contacts, I have seen private seminars privately taped from the audience. Bearden seems to know what time it is, has a passion for fringe sciences, and is not using his influence to push his own inventions. He seems too smart to be doing all he does just for attention. In certain circles, politics have an influence. I am not in a position to be able to verify everything he says, much is beond my understanding, or interest. What I can personally confirm is this.. there are real devices being suppressed, I have 2 in my possesion. I am from missoura in that respect, “show me state”, I would have always suspected, but never firmly believed until I observed free energy in my own hand. Unless someone keeps breaking into my house for the last couple of years, and recharges my crystal battery… the damn thing keeps on working. I test it with a couple of my scopes from time to time, it has not diminished at all. I appreciate the skeptics. But the armchair knowitalls should withdraw from the conversation. Some of us are trying to get working prototypes into your homes at great self sacrifice and personal expense irregardless of a proffit or business plan. Who keeps repeating bullcrap funfacts put forward by some idiot on wikipedia? Whoever believes the idiot who keeps reverting to unsubstanciated crap should blow away. There are very few intelligent persons out there, the rest just read one paragraph, and claim to know something. What good is a skeptic who does nothing other than put forward argumentative opinions? Just another useless mouth. As for reproducing effects, John is not too very co-operative any longer. Those he elected to show are reproducing effects. Why should he keep giving info away, hes broke as hell. cut off from all funding these days. I wouldnt help the greedy theiving scientists who sell out his principals to build weapons for amerika either. He still wants to do documentaries to inspire people, however.. if some one was to put a price on anti gravity, how much would it be worth if it was your invention? would you just give it away? John asked for 8 million$ for his entire lab, and all the instruction he has to reproduce it. No one bought the lab. His lawyers told him to hold out for 22 million, he thought it would be a quick sale at 8, but no takers. So he is pacing himself with small film productions and private ventures and still looking for retirement options, he is human after all… really sad circumstances. no good deed goes unpunnished tho, does it?

I’ll certainly agree with annon when he/she says “pseudoscientist types are very similar to cult types who are almost religious about their beliefs, irregardless of a lack of evidence.” (Though “irregardless” isn’t a word.)

It’s just simply amazing where we could be if it weren’t for the evil scientists, the military, the oil companies, etc. And yet, compare the life we all lead (computers, broadband connections, cable and satellite tv, airline travel, weather satellites, mri scans, anesthesia, etc., etc., etc.) and these have been brought to us by…

The evil scientists.

By the way, John gave the go ahead to make public the crystal battery recipie. It has been posted on wiki, here is the gist of it…

Hutchison and his supporters surmise that these phenomena arise from zero-point energy or the Casimir effect. Hutchison also says that he invented a form of batteries, which he calls “Crystal Battery” or “Hiroshima cells”, which he describes as obtaining energy from the quantum vacuum using the Casimir effect. These batteries have been labeled by some as over-unity devices, however according to the claims made by Hutchison this would be incorrect. The basic formula for the batteries described by John includes: Rochelle salts, Gallum, Iron Pyrite, and Germainium. These are cooked and mixed with a variety of different compounds to vary strength. As the mixture cools inside the vessel of choice, an electrode is placed in the center. As the mixture solidifies, a high voltage current induced aligns the platelets of the different chemicals. A magnet is also used to to continuiously induce a flow of electrons which accumulate to the post. The germainium acts as a valve, or diode allowing electrons to travel in only one direction, thus creating a sustaining flow that never stops. The largest battery of this type ever created had a potential of about one million volts. Due to inconsistancies in the mixture, it became unstable and exploded covering the lab with powder. This device used in conjunction with a spectrum analyzer or scope has been used in the location of oil and mineral deposits from the air coupled with an old laptop. John Hutchison alledges George Lisicase stole a prototype shortly after the discovery, profitting to the tune of 70 million dollars. A friend of his alleges it detects “ghosts”, another uses a variation as a remote lie detector. As far as John himself admits, the electricity produced may be parasitic, feeding from cell towers and near by microwaves.

His site will elaborate more in the near future, he hopes anyone who tries it out succeeds and furthers his own research. he recommends making individual cells, and hooking them together in banks, seiries or parrallel depending on the load. He left off at the point where he was having difficulty with consistancy between the cells, and they will over heat and short if overloaded. Of course there are many remedies, slow capacitor storage, new vacuum chamber prep chaimbers.. we have full confidence in the people finding solutions to the consistancy problems. Every battery he ever made had different attributes.

Money? Are you broke, or just looking for a handout? Id rather trust a street begger.

Hahaha! Ya!

Im with Rob. I built crystal sets that needed no power when I was 12 (theyve been around since the 1900s) Not much effort needed to build one. You post a lot of crap about some idiot making millions. Im fully aware of the idea of Zero point, same problem as anti gravity in as much as making it work on a larger scale. I will refrain from insults, it shows a lack of education. Im not interested in crackpot theories, only workable ideas. Rob said it all.

Hello John,

I put out the story that Paris blogs to your web site, to a few media outlets. I point out that she is smarter than most people think. She explains to you how the media works in Hollywood, and welcomes you, and your upcoming Fox TV Show. In which you will reproduce the Philadelphia experiment as well as other impressive things.
Paris has a very good grasps of how to arrange the media for it best impact and she’s teaching you. this is very smart. And that she knows of you makes her more dynamic. People will want to know who is john Hutchinson is. then your charisma will come in handy.

If you start getting calls, this is what this is about. Be ready to talk about the Philly experiment, Ron, Anti- Gravity experiments, Celebrity guest.plus Paris will be on the show. Because we will invite her.

If all the talk is about Paris, then milk it and talk about as much as they want. Such as :
It was very generous of Paris to inform me of how the media works. She is interested in many things.
Safe kind statements.

Thanks, Robert

Hello John,

I hear what you are saying. she need only talk or be in 1 episode It doesn’t matter if they hate Paris. I know people hate Steven S. just as much or more.
Paris has a hit show (The simple life)that has gone on for 5 seasons on FOX. People use to hate Howard Stern in the same way 20 years ago.
Yet people kept watching. they couldn’t stop watching or listing to Howard. Now he’s worth 800 million.
Paris is the same. If they hate her so much stop paying attention to her. Yet they won’t. Her paying attention to you will go all over the world. There will be other celeb’s which we will want to meet you because she did.

thank you, Robert

Hello John,

I put out the story that Paris blogs to your web site, to a few media outlets. I point out that she is smarter than most people think. She explains to you how the media works in Hollywood, and welcomes you, and your upcoming Fox TV Show. In which you will reproduce the Philadelphia experiment as well as other impressive things.
Paris has a very good grasps of how to arrange the media for it best impact and she’s teaching you. this is very smart. And that she knows of you makes her more dynamic. People will want to know who is john Hutchinson is. then your charisma will come in handy.

If you start getting calls, this is what this is about. Be ready to talk about the Philly experiment, Ron, Anti- Gravity experiments, Celebrity guest.plus Paris will be on the show. Because we will invite her.

If all the talk is about Paris, then milk it and talk about as much as they want. Such as :
It was very generous of Paris to inform me of how the media works. She is interested in many things.
Safe kind statements.

Thanks, Robert.

John –

Do not forward or I will seriously kick your ass…I’ve been drinking beer, so I’m being more honest than usual. Jesus, breaking my own rules…

NGEO is National Geographic.

“XXXXX” is OSD – and the “aerospace exec” I told you about is actually is Paul’s boss — an undersecretary of defense. Not sure which one…

They’ve been pushing BPP (and your work) into the Pentagon for about 2+ years now – the Pentagon presentation I told you about was their biggest push. Remember – standing ovation? That was CIA, DIA, NRO, USAF, and a few others….about 400 officers in a joint briefing, at least that’s what I was told.

They’ve been fighting on behalf of your research like crazy for the last couple of years, mostly because of the footage that we put together. They want to fund you. GXXXX doesn’t (he would, but doesn’t have the budget). If they fund you, it will be pure science, not weaponized..

PXXX is a believer, but his boss is still skeptical – that’s why I need to get solid footage with HZXXX. If I can get that, you’ll have somebody really valuable at your place in the very near future.

THAT is the reason that I’ve been bugging you so much lately — you’re amazingly close. Closer than John Alexander, who was a Lt. Colonel. Right now we’re at the undersecretary of Defense, and I know that Rumsfeld has looked at your work also. If we can put together a couple of hours of solid footage, then we’re set. Then you’ll have a lab, and I’ll quit pestering you.

BTW – If it matters, the “funders” that I told you about are Army Intelligence out of Ft. Meade (NSA). They showed up about 6 months ago. Mostly their interest is having me cover aXXXXXXX conferences, but my handler is friends with PXX, so part of our deal was letting me cover XXXresearch without being censored. (I didn’t ask about UFO’s, and I have no clue about anything else).
XXXX

——————————————————————————–
From: john hutchison [mailto:heffect@infinet.net]
Sent: Monday, August 07, 2006 12:40 AM
To: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Subject: RE: XXXX and I coming over..?

Hi tim what is ngeo ?? what does lisa want ?? she can have it as it leads to good things in the long term I got it here

——————————————————————————–

From: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Sent: Saturday, August 05, 2006 2:31 PM
To: ‘john hutchXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Subject: RE: XXXXXXand I coming over..?

HI John –

Are you going to be home tomorrow? We’d like to give it at least a shot then.

I know that you’re frustrated – I’m not in any better position than you are. I’m doingXXXXXXXX on the weekends just to help pay the bills, which are escalating out of control. Nobody in my audience gives a shit: I sent out some funding requests last month and got back nothing. It’s generalized apathy on a massive-scale — at least in your case you can pull up stakes and find someplace to go.

Lisa’s not going to be able to help – Coast and NGEO want the footage for their audience, and that’s it. In my case, I don’t want your existing footage, but I’d like to shoot some of my own for the Air Force guys. If I can take them footage of the effect plus my first-hand word that it happened when I was there, then I think they’ll fund you like they promised to. Also,XXXXXXfrom the STAIF Conference also wants to visit in the next couple of weeks, and he knows a bunch of aerospace-industry execs that can help…he was talking about bringing one of them with him.

I’ve been trying to get you funding for a long time – since we visited last year. I keep getting told that everybody loves your work, but they’re nervous about putting money into it without solid confirmation that it’s a real effect. That’s why I need to be there (otherwise I could just stay home & take XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX If we can get you funding, I still won’t get anything out of it, but at least it will be a way to help a friend pay his bills, and it may even lead you into funding for a research lab.

XXXXXXXXXXXXXX can pay for XXXXX, Arizona where they’re going to put this thing together. It’s going to take setting up the XXXX first to make it financially practical, but that’s the best they can do. I’m telling you buddy, nobody has cash at the moment, which is why the Air Force & aerospace industry is such a compelling opportunity – at present, they’re the only game in town.

Anyhow, let us drop by tomorrow afternoon — if nothing else, we can get your worries on tape, and maybe that’ll help the situation. If you want to fire up the equipment, maybe we can capture some footage, and I can use that to strong-arm the USAF guys, and XXXwill use it to sell his aerospace-exec on a trip up to your place.

XXXX

——————————————————————————–

From: john hutchison [mailto:heffect@infinet.net]
Sent: Saturday, August 05, 2006 1:47 PM
To: ‘XXXXXXXXXXXXX
Cc: XXXXX
Subject: REXXXXXX and I coming over..?

Hi guys lisa is on standby this stuff is for the originators as well as XXX tv I think I indicated that in my email unless you guys want to ship XXXXX is getting results with his XXX hes my student of many who is willing to learn this stuff iam calling it a wrap and getting out of here plus theres already a number of complaints DO I CARE NO cheers john

——————————————————————————–

From: HXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Sent: Saturday, August 05, 2006 10:01 AM
To: john hutchison
Subject: XXXand I coming over..?

Hi John… I just got off the phone with XX who called me as he and I would be very interested in coming over with both our video cameras to capture as much as possible while your up and running. If tomorrow is convenient, XXXXXX could be up fromXXXXX by 11 or noon and we could position the two cameras for best results should something happen. And as a side benefit, I also think it just might be a good opportunity to get you back on Coast as XXXXX and I could put together a good synopsis of what you’re doing and then we could suggest to Coast that they have you back on (if your interested in that)?

XXXXX will also be in touch with you and I’ll try calling you a little later when I’m in New West as my son and I will be working out at the Canada Games pool todayXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Report to moderator 209.17.145.97

——————————————————————————–

JOHN KENNETH HUTCHISON LOVE BEACHS I WILL NOT GROW UP; ONLY IN EMERGENTCYS!OFF SOUTH MAY THE WIND BE AT OUR BACKS !ON THE EDGE OF FOREVER AND A DAY; I WILL SEE YOU SOON ; HIDDEN MESSAGES PERHAPS;YET WE ARE ALL SPECIAL AND DONT FORGET IT SEE YOU ON THE BEACH AT DUSK SOMEWHERE

Pages: [1]

« previous next »

Jump to:
posted by John Hutchison at 10:37 PM 0 comments links to this post

NEW FILM
Tuesday, October 3, 2006
Elaine Smitha’s Evolving Ideas

Live Interview with Filmmaker Jim Cherry, about the soon to be released
story of John Hutchison, titled: The Poltergeist.
Hutchison, a self educated physicist, is a living symbol of the new energy
movement. His controversial anti-gravity experiments are unexplainable,
except when measured against the electromagnetic fields and their mysterious

As mentioned in Wikipedia, many armchair skeptics have presented explanations for how the footage of the Hutchison-Effect might be faked. Often cited as an example is a piece of video shot by Peter Von Puttkamer in 2003 showing what appears to be a toy UFO suspended on a string as evidence. The video, which aired in a Canadian television broadcast, includes a narrative that describes a single-wire transmission system that John was experimenting with on a particular day. It is not considered to be part of the “classic” Hutchison-Effect, and has no bearing on the veracity of experimental footage shot during the 1980′s. The experiment and its intent has been often misinterpreted due to early streaming-video of the footage, which excluded the explanatory narrative.

Another common skeptical accusation is that Hutchison is “tilting the room” (presumably an enclosure that can be rotated on it’s axis without changing the camera orientation). This is provided as evidence that simple camera trickery is used to provide the antigravity & levitation effects shown in a variety of Hutchison Effect videoclips. Close examination of the original “lost footage” clearly shows, however, that Hutchison’s footage is shot in a variety of areas in concrete-floored rooms, and full-length footage often shows floor-to-ceiling camera-pans that would be impossible for a mounted camera to achieve.

To clarify for the record, the burden of proof appears to demonstrate that the Hutchison Effect is a real and demonstrable natural effect, and that Hutchison is not faking the effect for publicity, money, or other motives.

Interviews with Dr. George Hathaway, Col. John Alexander, and television crews from Japan, Europe, and several networks in North America all verify that documented effects have been witnessed by many people at once, caught on multiple cameras (both amateur and professional), and do not involve simple trickery.

Other skeptics have suggested that while the Effect is real, it is not a natural phemenon, but instead a “psychic” or “PK” (psychokinesis) effect. This seemingly outlandish notion is the result of a report filed by a Stanford Research Institute team in the 1980′s, who were funded by INSCOM Colonel John Alexander and focused primarily on researching suspected psychic-phenomenon.

While this team verified that the Hutchison Effect did occur, they were unable to provide a scientific explanation for it, and thus described it as being psycho-kinetic in nature. Hutchison has speculated that the effect might also have been described as PK in order to keep it from being classified by the Army Intelligence and Security Command (INSCOM) as important to national security.

Recent Events
During DVD filming by American Antigravity, we were unable to capture the H-Effect on film due to Hutchison lacking the RF-tube equipment that he used throughout the 1980′s to generate the classic effect. This inability (from 1992 to 2006) to recreate the classic Hutchison Effect is in fact the reason that Hutchison was experimenting with other projects, such as the single-wire transmission system filmed by Peter Von Puttkamer. During part of this period of time, John was also under a voluntary test restriction by the local Vancouver mayor, who previously received calls from panicked neighbors during John’s experiments.

In March 2006, this situation changed when a former colleague of Hutchison’s – Alex Cherechesku – moved to a new house in Vancouver, and during the move returned an original RF tube amplifier to John that had been presumed lost over a decade earlier. Hutchison immediately began new experimentation, and during filming with well-known Canadian paranormal investigator Harold Berndt, was able to demonstrate several hundred pounds of equipment slam itself into an apartment wall with no apparent causal force. American Antigravity plans a return trip to attempt to capture the effect hopefully before the end of the year in 2007.

Recent Speculation
PhD Electrical Engineer James Corum co-authored a paper in 1981 with graduate-student Terry Keech where they analyzed how the metric tensor & gravity would be modified for a time-varying electric charge. The calculations that they derived & published suggest that a time-varying electric-charge can produce a ‘gravitational repulsion’ or negative gravitational-mass. Click Here

International Journal of Theoretical Physics (IJTP); Volume 20, 1981, pp. 63-68; Terry Keech and James Corum “New Derivation for the field of a time-varying charge in Einstein’s Field-Theory”.

Dr. George Hathaway and American Antigravity’s Tim Ventura believe that the jellification effects demonstrated by Hutchison may come from a disruption of valence-electron binding by resonant RF interference.

Ventura has designed an experiment to potentially verify this theory by recording the Hutchison Effect on an active sample using a logging multimeter, and then re-apply the same complex RF signal to the same signal at a later time using a linear-amplifier to match the original amplitude. Thus, while the original effect requires a complex arrangement of RF and high-voltage equipment to produce, it may be reproduced with a very simplistic and well-understood apparatus, verifying that a specific resonant signal is what causes the effect, and not psychokinetic or other causal factors.

Another notable factor has come to light since 2005 that also may play an important role in explaining the effect. Hutchison notes that the jellification effect begins in the middle of his sample (lengthwise), at least in the of long aluminum, brass, and steel bars. This may indicate that the length of the sample plays a role in coupling the RF signal that creates the effect to a specific sample

Posted by: “enixer” enixer@wpswireless.com enixer_gkshow

Sat Oct 20, 2007 4:25 pm (PST) Omg …. I got a delivery failure trying to email the director of that site
his name is Khoury.. Can all you guys email him and ask what happened to the
Cooper videos???
Heres his email… Let me know if you get a delivery failure also…
Director@ufogroupsnetwork.org

Huggs, E
Hi E,
Now this doesn’t surprise me. A few years ago I butted heads with this Khoury guy. I posted answers to the lies he was telling in his group and he kicked me out. I even talked to him on the phone and after checking him out determined he was apparently some not too bright hired thug on maybe the CIA payroll who was out there to spread disinformation. I caught him in a lot of lies in other groups, showed definitive information about the truth, and he started threatening me. LOL
Art

__._,_.___
Messages in this topic (1) Reply (v

John:

Getting these various toys made small is going to be essential to keeping the various electronic and electrical systems and compact AND reasonably cheap. Good thinking John as we cannot finalize the final cut & bend blueprint design until we have cube measured all the pieces of the systems and determined how we are going to wire it up. Dr. Mark Pesses the physicist and Chief scientist at SAIC in D.C. is apparently willing to hep us get what we are going to need produced off books at his firm after hours. He is reportedly going on payroll for RP to help us get this done including meeting and teaming up with Elizabeth to write the math of the RAM physics. With Colin McCavett at STARA Inc. in Tucson providing us the RC controls and other aspects for the various rig systems, that could make construction a real possible in 120 days. I want you to consider involving John Bedini in this effort as to finalizing our construction and testing. His machines are really beautiful works of electrical engineering art and he likes to work with HV resistant acrylics to construct his rigs. We have a good wire to him via William Gazeki the documentary film producer in L.A. take a look at his web sites and let me know your feelings on this.

You have left your “Mark” everywhere !!

Robert

John,” From Paris Hilton John ? Gordon does he want me in the film ? Let me backtrack into an idea lol ;; I’ve been successful at every last thing I’ve done since that time (except personal relationships, but I think I now understand why I do that to myself, too…another time for that discussoin, though, especially as I have left that behind me now). WHY have I been successful? Because every time I walked into an interview, or tried to do/accomplish something, I did it from that same mindset…and there was a principle at play here — act like you already are. Step into the role…and it becomes yours. Believe. Faith in the mystery. Simple analogy here. Someone doesn’t need to understand WHY flipping the switch makes the light go on…they just need to believe they should flip the switch, to take advantage of the technology. John, the believing…It has NEVER failed. I believe in this principle, completely, totally. I also believe that reality is, for lack of a better way to verbalize it, largely under our control. That we script our own lives to a very large degree. People get caught up in their dramas, and forget that at any moment, we can completely walk, totally flip the script. But it is ever there. It is a powerful thing to know, and I’ve done it, seen others do it. Many best-selling self-help books are based on it, too. Think and Grow Rich, for instance.

Anyhow…here goes. I want a partner —someone who is willing to toy with reality with me..someone to help me write a script, and see what happens. With complete intent. Far more so than what I played with over the years. Thing is, if you don’t believe in the script with every last atom of your being, it won’t work. It will automatically fail. What script? Anything we want, and I am pretty much open to trying ANY, as long as it doesn’t hurt, demean, or psychologically harm my kids, myself, or you if you find this idea intriguing enough to try. The script can be anything…we can work together, scripting a project as large or small as we like, and make it a reality. In an area totally expected, or so far out there it is unbelievable. It can be a unique friendship with magical qualities (believe the magic is there, and it will be). It can be an exploration of hard core scientific ‘facts’ that we seek to either support or undo, or it can be an exploration of the paranormal. Psychological explorations. ANYTHING, the only limits being our imagination. I know the examples I set herein aren’t revealing the deep power of this…and that perhaps I framed this in a way that is missing the passion that is possible in something like this..I am not talking of mundane things. I’m talking we write a script, agree it is going to be a reality, and make it happen. This is not like writing a business proposal (though I believe that that is WHY business proposals become reality…someone has set a path to making something concrete…I believe reality is about focus, and a business plan creates focus). I am talking about AGREEING TO A SCRIPT AND THEN CHANGING OUR PARADIGM IMMEDIATELY TO EMBRACE IT. Oh, I KNOW I’m not getting it right in here. I cannot put it into words tonight…why? Because it is so exciting to me that I can feel every atom of my being jumping about at the possibility. I’m talking it can be ANYTHING. Walk through walls? Why not? And if we can do things with machines…hmmm…maybe you will think this nuts, but I’ll try it on for size, learn a bit about you. I know I risk losing your respect here, perhaps. but so be it, truth and honesty come first. You can build a machine that can do unusual things…for instance, levitation. But see…ok, Bach put it best in illusions (I’m going to paraphrase, it has been forever since I read it). He wanted to fly –without a plane. Figures that planes took so long to be invented because noone believed they could be. Once someone believed, bam, it was made into reality. HOwever, the person(s) imagining flight were imagining it with machines. If you believe you can fly without a machine, it is merely a matter of experimenting until you find the right way…same thing they did when experimenting with machines that could fly. In other words, once you believe it is possible, you apply yourself to discovering the principles. For instance, you can make things levitate with the aid of a machine. Well, what if you shift the paradigm and believe you can make things levitate WITHOUT a machine. What if you modify the definition of machine to include YOUR BRAIN OR BODY CHEMISTRY as a machine…could you then begin to reframe it all, with looking to levitate with the aid of a new machine, your brain? Or with the electrical impulses in your body? From there you can start to examine your biology, in relation to the chemical makeup of the world around you. Are there ways in which they interact that can be manipulated, without a machine, but with some approach akin to biofeedback (ah, not exactly, but I am trying to NOT write an entire book to you tonight, lol…are you getting the idea? Is this totally insane? ).

I have talked this over with the other PERSON on many occasions. At one point, when we were both already in a relationship, we were discussing WHY arranged marriages seem to turn out so well (the studies on this are astounding). Yes, there is something to the fact that perhaps the parents are choosing well, based on compatability factors, and matching up socio-economic levels, etc. BUT, what if it were not because of that, but because of the paradigm. You are entering into a relationship based upon the premise that it is going to work. You walk down that aisle, perhaps seeing your husband for the first time, and you go home, and you make it work. That is all. No questions asked. This is reality . You are married, and it is going to work. We used to toy with the idea (we were both pretty unhappy in the relationships we were in at the time, lol). What if we had found a like-minded soul, someone we could trust inherently, know competely, and sat down and wrote a script? There is a song by Jewel called Painters. She tells of a couple who made their love an art to live by…created blueprints for their love. This song sort of captures a bit of this concept…you agree to do something, and manifest it. SEE???? This principle can be applied to ANYTHING. (I’m going to attach the lyrics to the song below, it is such a cool thing,l think).

I believe the love story of authors Henry Miller and Anais Nin is one of the greatest in history (not the greatest, but definitely ONE of the greatest). I have a sneaking suspicion that they did something similar to this. Their’s was bittersweet, they didn’t wind up together in the end. But I think they WANTED it that way…for they were writers, and they appreciated the tragic beauty of such a story, the poignancy. And each had their own life, their own love, their own interests. They created Miller and Nin, greatest love story of their time..with intent. More for the poetry, than pehaps for what was there.

So see, it can be applied to anything. Let us build a flying machine never before seen, or a board game wherein the pawns electronically communicate with the board, and assess different situations, let us walk through a wall, or communicate with another dimension, or get to know an entity personally, as in very well, or open a museum just for kids unlike any that has ever before been seen, that blows away all science museums ever before seen…an imaginarium that pushes the limits; let us create a sci-fi story (fact or fiction, perhaps a combination of both) that pushes the limits; let us create our own frankenstein; let us convince authorities to let us camp out in the sphinx for a night…do you see what I’m saying? Let us begin a great game…let us break all rules, let us warp and distort reality, make our own stories, rescript life. lol, I guess I’m asking you to join me in an adventure, but not the kind people typically explore. When time allows after this jail MESS LOL OK??????

I THINK what I’m proposing is that we become ‘partners in crime’ (lol, though I’m not talking crime per se, because I want permissions where permissions aren’t granted — oh, and btw, my friends and I , back then, would create little challenges, like ‘breaking a minor law, right in front of a police officer, and getting him to laugh about it wiht you’ – or getting the police and fire department who show up to close down your party to instead come join it when they are off duty, Well I think this jail time lol “”"”"Was not fun “”"Or to get the 80 y/o senator to come to the nightclub and dance on the speakers with you; to get John Updike to play telephone at the dinner table with you…we did all these things – oh, and to go out for an evening, and pretend you are named ginger and maryann, and go the whole night telling people your life story as if you really WERE stranded on an island, and to do it so in such a way that they believed you, and never caught on that you were taking it straight from the script of gilligan’s island). But I want to take it to new levels…with no limits.

ANYTHING JOHN!!! And what I’m asking here is a simple experiment. Let us get creative, let our imaginations run wild, and try it out…something intriguing, unusual, out there. Just between us…no one else has to know. We can start oh-so-small. We don’t even have to meet to do it, even. I’m saying, let us be reality weavers, cloudbusters, whatever..but with intent, and with the complete commitment to the idea that we are not limited WHATSOEVER by laws of physics/nature/culture…

I’m not saying be totally mad in this…or dangerous even. (oh, but the idea itself seems so dangerous…do you know what I mean when I say ideas can be dangerous? Not to others so much as ourselves…an idea can shake us to the core of our being…can change our entire world, leave us unsettled to the end of our days…!). I’m just saying…let us script something crazy, and make it reality.

Sort of like Dungeons and Dragons, but different, lol. And real. If you think about it, where really IS the difference between fantasy and reality? You may be sitting there on your sofa, someone who has never traveled more than 50 miles from their home. You see a show that gets you thinking…I want to see Paris! Something inside you shifts, you believe now that you will see Paris. Next thing you know, you are saving money. Looking into fares. Taking time off from work. Booking your flight. Departing on that flight.

What if you were sitting on your sofa, and instead of deciding you want to go to Japan lets say you decide you want to walk through walls? And something shifts inside you, you now believe that you WILL walk through walls. Well…the only thing that TRULY makes this more difficult to do than Japan is that no one has left you a blueprint…see, you know, be it from friends, or TV, or reading, or from experience, what planning a trip will involve. Well, planning to walk through walls, we don’t have good information on how to do that, and we haven’t seen it being done for real. We’ve seen others decide to go to Japan and make it happen, so it is TANGIBLE to us. WEll…those who first built flying machines were in the same position as the fella sitting on the couch deciding to walk through walls… no prior examples of success, no blueprints.

YOU of all people should get this. You have been an explorer, a discoverer, a detective. What I’m proposing here is we pick ANYTHING. only imagination limits us. And we do it. More intentionally. And we document it. ANd if it is intriguing, we spoon feed the concept to the rest of the world. Give others a little magic to believe in. Open a few minds. Let others see that life is endless possibility. Because…it is. But people get trapped, and it is all illusion, it is only their own minds, their own imaginations that hold them back.

OK, I can’t fully explain what I’m proposing here. I’m just saying…take this little bit that I put forth here, and let us play…like children…like god-children, children who have the ability to weave worlds…because isn’t that all ANY of us do when we write the script that is our life? Because let us be honest here, we DO write our scripts. OK, one can argue that the juvenile factors aren’t written by us…even if we don’t touch that one…who we are today is determined by us, by each choice we make along the way…oh, I hope I haven’t lost you here. I’m sleepy, and not getting this down as lucidly, as eloquently as I’d like.

I approach you with this (and Laura and I have always been, till now, too afraid to share the idea with anyone else, because we didn’t think anyone else would get it…) because you are the explorer that you are, you have a solid education in both science and the paranormal, a tremendous imagination, and I have connected with you on a deep level that I think indicates (I could be wrong…in everything…in all things…that is my caveat) you have wha t it takes, and that we have enough in common on the levels where it is important, to make this happen.

SO…do you want to try this little game? Write the script with me…whatever it may be. You can throw the subjects out there, I’m open to exploring pretty much any idea…again, if I am not comfortable with something, I will simply tell you it.

Think on this. The possibilities are endless. I guess what I”m saying is this: Let’s explore the potential to STOP EVERYTHING and take as full a control of our destiny (in one small area at least) as we can. The examined life. The chosen life. The life uncommon.

Doing this with a partner is, as Laura and I discussed, what will make it more real….someone to collaborate with.

And yes, she and I did play with this a little bit. And on minor levels we have made it happen. Thing is, she and I have very different lives right now, as she has toddlers to raise, an out-of-work husband, and a huge law career that she is tryingt o juggle. Time to commit to changing any of that is what she lacks (ironic, as those are EXACTLY the kinds of things she could address..I think she is just afraid). SO…I’m proposing a leap in reality.

LOL…and while I nkow what I mean by this, I also DO NOT know what I mean…meaning (lol) that I know it intuitively, but it is yet needing more focus…

Am I making ANY sense at all? I’m talking, quite simply, taking the bull by the horns…but in something wherein most people don’t…any topic. any area of life. think about it…

Or write me off as too much of a fruitcake to deal with…I wouldn’t blame you, to be honest.

Anyhow, song lyrics are below….Hugs! Paris oops getting very ready to be released from here JAIL lol More medias Just like my first post remember ?thank you for saving them “John “PARIS HILTON” PXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 818XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX310XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 310XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

http://www.newfrontier.com/asheville/past-virato-live-2006.htm#04-29-2-06

: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c_QrSTlNnek
http://science.discovery.com/tv-schedules/series.html?paid=48.13776.120356.11352.3
http://www.bluebookfilms.com/
http://www.coasttocoastam.com/shows/2003/06/27.html
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5722629372257156662
ROB SIMONE writes: Hi Bill,

I was just at John’s apt/laboratory with a camera crew for new TV series i’m co-producing and hosting. We shot for over 7 hours, in High Def, and captured some extraordinary footage.

You may ask about the HGH bottle that floated in the air for the better part of 20 min. It was constant and controlled…..stunning…:)

It seemed to have ‘over-driven’ some of the components, I’m not sure if that is a common problem…

Rob Simone

http://armsdump2007.blogspot.com/

they delete post here http://caa-fox.blogspot.com/ paris wrote in on that issues

this guy did it in the 70′s, he was probably high and thought it would be a cool thing to see. plus he’s in vancouver, its a requirement to be high to live there.

John Hutchison is simply a faker. The videos depicting levitation were clearly shot upside down. I too want to believe that the known rules of physics can be altered by human ingenuity but, the truth is, the only amazing thing Mr. Hutchinson has accomplished is creating deception on such a large scale. Put this lie to rest folks and move on with your lives. If you are not a skeptic, then you have been deceived by a fool. Don’t believe something because you prefer one outcome over another. Think like a scientist, ask questions, experiment, be objective. I have found that the most simple explanation is usually the correct one.
Shame on you JH for perpetuating this hoax. It is time for you to put the weed down and own up to your deception so no more serious thought or time is wasted on your absurd claims. You have done more harm than good so drop the crap about being a victim of a government conspiracy.
One more thing people, when writing anything that you want other people to take seriously, use spellcheck or a dictionary, most of the above comments read like they were written by 3rd graders. Forrest Gump had it right when he said “Stupid is as stupid does.”

Clearly brooms have some type of special antigravity effect…
The space station solution to antigravity – just bring a broom…

and lets review Newtons Law too for non-broom matter – what goes up must, umm, stay up?

What a crock…

Exceptions prove the rule, and wreck the budget.
– Miller

—————————————————————————————————-
http://maribradshaweg.easyjournal.com

She fastened thatseventh button again. Cumming. Generally we have been girl rubbing clit too much higher.

Life is too short for bad beer. :-)

I am a skeptic and I was also very interested in John Hutchinsons claims. Whether there fake or not, I started to think about what would constitute as real. I am starting to think, whats the purpose of watching a video of a claim, if there’s no scientist to observe the phenomena. If there isn’t any one there with a certain amount of credibility then we are always going to say the video is Fake! I think part of being a skeptic is to be a skeptic towards skeptics also. Were always going to figure out ways that WE could have replicated the video, but is that what is actually happening. So I am just wondering is it even possible to prove realness via video without the presence of credible scientist??

hmm..turns out it might not be fake. Check this levitation out…it’s real and has been confirmed HUNDREDS of times.

http://jnaudin.free.fr/index.htm

Popers The Drug [url=http://www.thecheesemac.com/]valium price[/url] Other possible signs of anxiety include chest pains, difficulty swallowing, depression, and sleep disorders. http://www.thecheesemac.com/ – diazepam online

Cancer Colorectal Drug http://zone4pets.com/ – precio viagra Este al igual que mucho de los otros medicamente de este tipo actA?a aumentando el torrente sanguA­neo en el pene, causando como resultado una erecciA?n al momento de querer tener relaciones sexuales. [url=http://zone4pets.com/]comprar viagra online[/url]

In the term “first trust deed�, what does the word “first� mean?

acetaminophen side effects…

[...]Ade :: The Discovery Channel is Bogus[...]…

Proteine…

[...]Ade :: The Discovery Channel is Bogus[...]…

BlueNet device…

[...]Ade :: The Discovery Channel is Bogus[...]…

Wow, amazing blog layout! How lengthy have you been blogging for? you make running a blog glance easy. The overall glance of your site is wonderful, as well as the content!

Trade Shows in India – Directory of Trade Fairs, Exhibition, Trade Events, Conferences and Business Seminars held in India. Find here details information about Details on http://www.indiantradeshows.com

North Face Jacket, Northface Jackets…

[...]Ade :: The Discovery Channel is Bogus[...]…

All about care of beauty and health…

[...]Ade :: The Discovery Channel is Bogus[...]…

HDC-HS700k Purchase…

[...]Ade :: The Discovery Channel is Bogus[...]…

We’re a group of volunteers and opening a brand new scheme in our community. Your site provided us with useful information to work on. You have done a formidable activity and our whole group will likely be grateful to you.

laptop dc jack repair2…

[...]Ade :: The Discovery Channel is Bogus[...]…

Training For Management…

[...]Ade :: The Discovery Channel is Bogus[...]…

Hello there, You have done a fantastic job. I’ll certainly digg it and individually suggest to my friends. I’m sure they will be benefited from this web site.

Tigari Electronice Ploiesti…

[...]Ade :: The Discovery Channel is Bogus[...]…

F*ckin’ awesome things here.I’m very glad to see your post.Thanks a lot and i am looking forward to contact you.Will you kindly drop me a mail?

Vocabulary Level Answers…

[...]Ade :: The Discovery Channel is Bogus[...]…

Kinderkleding…

[...]Ade :: The Discovery Channel is Bogus[...]…